How Programmers at Microsoft Wear Socks?
Posted on January 9th, 2009 at 10:18 by fr3@K

I mean, these (ed: programmers) are people who are lucky if they are wearing matching socks when they come to work, if they even remember to wear socks at all.

Quoted from The Old New Thing.

del.icio.us:How Programmers at Microsoft Wear Socks? digg:How Programmers at Microsoft Wear Socks? spurl:How Programmers at Microsoft Wear Socks? newsvine:How Programmers at Microsoft Wear Socks? furl:How Programmers at Microsoft Wear Socks? Y!:How Programmers at Microsoft Wear Socks? 黑米共享書籤:How Programmers at Microsoft Wear Socks? 推推王:How Programmers at Microsoft Wear Socks?
詳細錯誤說明的重要性
Posted on September 26th, 2008 at 1:21 by fr3@K

這是一個我想寫很久了的主題, 由於我也搞不清楚的原因 delay 到這個時候. Anyway, here it goes…
(more…)

del.icio.us:詳細錯誤說明的重要性 digg:詳細錯誤說明的重要性 spurl:詳細錯誤說明的重要性 newsvine:詳細錯誤說明的重要性 furl:詳細錯誤說明的重要性 Y!:詳細錯誤說明的重要性 黑米共享書籤:詳細錯誤說明的重要性 推推王:詳細錯誤說明的重要性
Microsoft Search SPAM is back
Posted on September 16th, 2008 at 19:56 by fr3@K

Here it comes again, referer spam from Microsoft’s live search engine is back. It managed to bypass the mod_rewrite rules I got from The Art of Web the last time I was spammed.

New rules (again, from The Art of Web) were installed last night. So far, the log spamming seems to be stopped.

Huge thanks to people from The Art of Web for documenting this instance and updating their blocking method.

del.icio.us:Microsoft Search SPAM is back digg:Microsoft Search SPAM is back spurl:Microsoft Search SPAM is back newsvine:Microsoft Search SPAM is back furl:Microsoft Search SPAM is back Y!:Microsoft Search SPAM is back 黑米共享書籤:Microsoft Search SPAM is back 推推王:Microsoft Search SPAM is back
Security Enhanced CRT, Safer Than Standard Library?
Posted on September 15th, 2008 at 0:48 by fr3@K

In a blog post Danny Kalev published earlier this year on InformIT, an example was presented demonstrating how one could write valid but insecure code involving vector and auto_ptr which compiles without any warning, despite other warnings Micorsoft’s recent compilers would’ve issued against standard compliant code. Along with other points he made in the post, Danny suggests Micorsoft doesn’t really care about your code safety. I couldn’t have agreed with him more, and would like to contribute my own analysis (aka. my two cents) in support of Danny’s finding.
(more…)

del.icio.us:Security Enhanced CRT, Safer Than Standard Library? digg:Security Enhanced CRT, Safer Than Standard Library? spurl:Security Enhanced CRT, Safer Than Standard Library? newsvine:Security Enhanced CRT, Safer Than Standard Library? furl:Security Enhanced CRT, Safer Than Standard Library? Y!:Security Enhanced CRT, Safer Than Standard Library? 黑米共享書籤:Security Enhanced CRT, Safer Than Standard Library? 推推王:Security Enhanced CRT, Safer Than Standard Library?
Live (MS) Search Spam
Posted on June 10th, 2008 at 22:37 by fr3@K

這幾個禮拜從 COdE fr3@K 的 log 開始注意到有愈來愈多 “人” 被 search.live.com 經由 “jeffhung” 這個 keyword 導到我的站上.
(more…)

del.icio.us:Live (MS) Search Spam digg:Live (MS) Search Spam spurl:Live (MS) Search Spam newsvine:Live (MS) Search Spam furl:Live (MS) Search Spam Y!:Live (MS) Search Spam 黑米共享書籤:Live (MS) Search Spam 推推王:Live (MS) Search Spam