re: 解读google C++ code style谈对C++的理解
Posted on May 30th, 2010 at 16:11 by fr3@K

Screenshot-解读google C++ code style谈对C++的理解 - 那谁的技术博客 - C++博客 - Mozilla Firefox
想加入這篇 解读google C++ code style谈对C++的理解 的討論. 不幸由於不明原因, 一直被系統認為是廣告 (圖中紅字部份):

先留個底, 再看看該/能怎麼辦吧.

ps. cppblog 帳號申請中, 也許有帳號就沒這問題了吧? 不過, 看起來申請帳號要經過人工審核…
(more…)

del.icio.us:re: 解读google C++ code style谈对C++的理解 digg:re: 解读google C++ code style谈对C++的理解 spurl:re: 解读google C++ code style谈对C++的理解 newsvine:re: 解读google C++ code style谈对C++的理解 furl:re: 解读google C++ code style谈对C++的理解 Y!:re: 解读google C++ code style谈对C++的理解 黑米共享書籤:re: 解读google C++ code style谈对C++的理解 推推王:re: 解读google C++ code style谈对C++的理解

Tagged with , , , , ,
2 Comments

後方, 起浪了
Posted on May 4th, 2010 at 23:54 by fr3@K

後方的浪.

del.icio.us:後方, 起浪了 digg:後方, 起浪了 spurl:後方, 起浪了 newsvine:後方, 起浪了 furl:後方, 起浪了 Y!:後方, 起浪了 黑米共享書籤:後方, 起浪了 推推王:後方, 起浪了

Tagged with , , , ,
2 Comments

[Update] boost::decay documentation issue
Posted on January 14th, 2010 at 17:35 by fr3@K

The issue with boost::decay documentation that I blogged about 10 days ago has been fixed in trunk.

del.icio.us:[Update] boost::decay documentation issue digg:[Update] boost::decay documentation issue spurl:[Update] boost::decay documentation issue newsvine:[Update] boost::decay documentation issue furl:[Update] boost::decay documentation issue Y!:[Update] boost::decay documentation issue 黑米共享書籤:[Update] boost::decay documentation issue 推推王:[Update] boost::decay documentation issue

Tagged with , , , ,
No Comments

What Should We Teach New Software Developers? Why?
Posted on January 5th, 2010 at 0:29 by fr3@K

Would you trust someone who had not seen a patient for years to teach surgery? What would you think of a piano teacher who never touched the keyboard? A CS education must bring a student beyond the necessary book learning to a mastery of its application in complete systems and an appreciation of aesthetics in code.

這句話說得真好.

via: What Should We Teach New Software Developers? Why? – Bjarne Stroustrup.

del.icio.us:What Should We Teach New Software Developers? Why? digg:What Should We Teach New Software Developers? Why? spurl:What Should We Teach New Software Developers? Why? newsvine:What Should We Teach New Software Developers? Why? furl:What Should We Teach New Software Developers? Why? Y!:What Should We Teach New Software Developers? Why? 黑米共享書籤:What Should We Teach New Software Developers? Why? 推推王:What Should We Teach New Software Developers? Why?

Tagged with ,
2 Comments

boost::decay documentation issue
Posted on January 4th, 2010 at 20:48 by fr3@K

前陣子看了 Hubert 的 一個 boost::exception 的例子, 猛然注意到自己不確定 boost::decay 的作用.

去看了它的 文件, 才發現文件不盡然正確… 已 submit 了一個 ticket 給 Boost, 希望早日修正.

del.icio.us:boost::decay documentation issue digg:boost::decay documentation issue spurl:boost::decay documentation issue newsvine:boost::decay documentation issue furl:boost::decay documentation issue Y!:boost::decay documentation issue 黑米共享書籤:boost::decay documentation issue 推推王:boost::decay documentation issue

Tagged with , , ,
No Comments

Bit-fu
Posted on January 3rd, 2010 at 11:40 by fr3@K

Did you know, for x is an integer, that -~x yields x + 1 and ~-x yields x - 1?

via: Advanced bit manipulation-fu.

del.icio.us:Bit-fu digg:Bit-fu spurl:Bit-fu newsvine:Bit-fu furl:Bit-fu Y!:Bit-fu 黑米共享書籤:Bit-fu 推推王:Bit-fu

Tagged with , , ,
No Comments

Another Good Interview Question in C++
Posted on January 2nd, 2010 at 17:10 by fr3@K

elleryq 的 這篇 blog post 談到的 ctor (換成 dtor 也一樣) 呼叫 virtual function 狀況 (或說是 problem) 會是很好的 C++ programmer 面試題目. 可在口試時用以窺探 interviewee 對 C++ object model 的了解.
(more…)

del.icio.us:Another Good Interview Question in C++ digg:Another Good Interview Question in C++ spurl:Another Good Interview Question in C++ newsvine:Another Good Interview Question in C++ furl:Another Good Interview Question in C++ Y!:Another Good Interview Question in C++ 黑米共享書籤:Another Good Interview Question in C++ 推推王:Another Good Interview Question in C++

Tagged with , ,
No Comments

一看就知道 – 不 Thread-Safe 的 API
Posted on December 1st, 2009 at 13:37 by fr3@K

Very well put :)

當你發現回傳的是一個 char *，又沒有要求你特別 free 他，你是不是就該猜測他是回傳 function 內部的一個 static buffer 了呢？

Via: 從 inet_ntoa 看 thread safe 的 API.

del.icio.us:一看就知道 - 不 Thread-Safe 的 API digg:一看就知道 - 不 Thread-Safe 的 API spurl:一看就知道 - 不 Thread-Safe 的 API newsvine:一看就知道 - 不 Thread-Safe 的 API furl:一看就知道 - 不 Thread-Safe 的 API Y!:一看就知道 - 不 Thread-Safe 的 API 黑米共享書籤:一看就知道 - 不 Thread-Safe 的 API 推推王:一看就知道 - 不 Thread-Safe 的 API

Tagged with , ,
3 Comments

Server side connection/session lingering
Posted on August 15th, 2009 at 18:39 by fr3@K

A great read on how to properly teardown a connection of synchronous protocols (e.g. HTTP) on the server side.

via: SO_LINGER is not the same as Apache’s “lingering close”.

del.icio.us:Server side connection/session lingering digg:Server side connection/session lingering spurl:Server side connection/session lingering newsvine:Server side connection/session lingering furl:Server side connection/session lingering Y!:Server side connection/session lingering 黑米共享書籤:Server side connection/session lingering 推推王:Server side connection/session lingering

Tagged with , ,
No Comments

The C++0x “Remove Concepts” Decision
Posted on August 9th, 2009 at 19:24 by fr3@K

懶人包 + Bjarne on DDJ (翻譯), from Paramecium.

Great job! Thanks, Keiko.

del.icio.us:The C++0x  digg:The C++0x  spurl:The C++0x  newsvine:The C++0x  furl:The C++0x  Y!:The C++0x  黑米共享書籤:The C++0x  推推王:The C++0x

Tagged with , , ,
No Comments

Page 1 of 7[ 1 ]2345»...Oldest