<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 咖啡因中毒</title>
	<atom:link href="http://fsfoundry.org/codefreak/2009/03/03/caffeine-intoxication/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://fsfoundry.org/codefreak/2009/03/03/caffeine-intoxication/</link>
	<description>Weblog of a lively geek.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 06:54:46 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: fr3@K</title>
		<link>http://fsfoundry.org/codefreak/2009/03/03/caffeine-intoxication/comment-page-1/#comment-4876</link>
		<dc:creator>fr3@K</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2009 10:32:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fsfoundry.org/codefreak/2009/03/03/caffeine-intoxication/#comment-4876</guid>
		<description>Hi jeffhung,

Thanks for your comment. I never thought about document sharing, that&#039;s a good point. Though, I am not so sure if it&#039;s worth it.

Thanks for the background filling, I think you are more familiar with these Java-to-C++ projects than I do. It sounds like a good idea to have a common Java-like support in C++ for organizations those port a lot of Java stuffs to C++. Yes, I mean Apache. There is &lt;strong&gt;Apache Portable Runtime&lt;/strong&gt;, why not a &lt;strong&gt;Apache Decaf Support&lt;/strong&gt;, or whatever they&#039;d like to call it.

Generally speaking, it is true that Java paradigm is one of C++ paradigms, so is C paradigm. Applying &lt;strong&gt;C-all-the-way&lt;/strong&gt; paradigm in C++ is considered a bad practice, IMO, so is &lt;strong&gt;Java-all-the-way&lt;/strong&gt; paradigm.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi jeffhung,</p>
<p>Thanks for your comment. I never thought about document sharing, that&#8217;s a good point. Though, I am not so sure if it&#8217;s worth it.</p>
<p>Thanks for the background filling, I think you are more familiar with these Java-to-C++ projects than I do. It sounds like a good idea to have a common Java-like support in C++ for organizations those port a lot of Java stuffs to C++. Yes, I mean Apache. There is <strong>Apache Portable Runtime</strong>, why not a <strong>Apache Decaf Support</strong>, or whatever they&#8217;d like to call it.</p>
<p>Generally speaking, it is true that Java paradigm is one of C++ paradigms, so is C paradigm. Applying <strong>C-all-the-way</strong> paradigm in C++ is considered a bad practice, IMO, so is <strong>Java-all-the-way</strong> paradigm.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jeffhung</title>
		<link>http://fsfoundry.org/codefreak/2009/03/03/caffeine-intoxication/comment-page-1/#comment-4872</link>
		<dc:creator>jeffhung</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2009 09:43:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fsfoundry.org/codefreak/2009/03/03/caffeine-intoxication/#comment-4872</guid>
		<description>There should be a mandatory library, maybe in Boost or Apache, to simulate Java paradigm in C++. So those caffeine-intoxicated projects can share a common java-liked environment.

Caffeine-intoxication is good for projects porting from Java to C++, at least many documents can be shared. So I have no opinion about this -- Java paradigm is one of C++ paradigms, too . But I’m really sick of every porting-from-java projects having their own java-simulation mechanism.

&lt;em&gt;[Duplicated comment removed. - fr3@K]&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There should be a mandatory library, maybe in Boost or Apache, to simulate Java paradigm in C++. So those caffeine-intoxicated projects can share a common java-liked environment.</p>
<p>Caffeine-intoxication is good for projects porting from Java to C++, at least many documents can be shared. So I have no opinion about this &#8212; Java paradigm is one of C++ paradigms, too . But I’m really sick of every porting-from-java projects having their own java-simulation mechanism.</p>
<p><em>[Duplicated comment removed. - fr3@K]</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
